Enterprise AI delivery · governance · adoption

One operating problem. One controlled AI workflow.

In 30 days, Roverax scopes one workflow, sets the agent's boundaries, builds a working prototype, and measures the result. Your team then has evidence to decide whether a production pilot is worth funding.

  • Working prototype
  • Named decision owner
  • Evidence for every action

Enterprise operations · transformation · risk · partner delivery · nash.vedula@roverax.ai

01/01

The business problem

AI earns its place inside the operating workflow.

Operational AI must work a queue, call approved tools, stop at a decision boundary, request review, and leave a usable record. Roverax builds and tests that path against the customer's process.

Starting pointA repeated decision with a measurable baseline
→
Operating workOwners, queues, tools, rules, and exceptions
→
Tested workflowBoundaries, review, evidence, and operating handoff

What we build

Four ways Roverax can help.

Transformation and adoption

Choose the use case, map the process, set the baseline, and prepare the team that will own it.

Governed agent workflows

Build agents that gather evidence, use approved tools, and stop for review before high-impact actions. Every run leaves a decision record.

Program control and decision support

Connect cost, schedule, risk, and supplier signals to a baseline, forecast, owner, and corrective action.

Voice and customer operations

Let the agent complete work inside its boundary. When a person needs to take over, pass the context, intent, and next action with the call.

Who this is for

Bring one bottleneck. Leave with a defined test.

Enterprise operations · transformation

Turn one operating problem into a controlled test

We map the work across teams, systems, and approval points, then define the owner, baseline, prototype, and operating handoff.

Map the first workflow

Risk · compliance · AI governance

Turn policy into controls people can run

Put NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 concepts into the workflow as permissions, review points, evidence requirements, and incident handling.

See the control pattern

Systems integrator · platform partner

You keep the account. We run the prototype.

Roverax runs the sandbox build, control design, test plan, and adoption handoff within your customer engagement.

See the partner model

Selected work

Three prototypes and one practitioner playbook.

Each prototype uses synthetic or public data. The cards state what is running, what is measured, and where a person remains responsible. Metered demos stay behind controlled access.

  • Field Command Center

    Problem

    A carrier sees churn, fraud, and service signals in separate systems, while customer actions still require eligibility checks and human approval.

    What it demonstrates

    A trained model scores churn. Rules limit the eligible actions, and an LLM ranks and explains them. A person approves the recommendation. The system seals the run in a hash-chained record.

    Research prototype · controlled access

    Schedule a walkthrough
  • Life and annuity capital raise

    Problem

    A life and annuity carrier wants to raise capital from an institutional investor. It must choose a suitable policy cohort and assemble the evidence for diligence.

    What it demonstrates

    Agents map the book and rank candidate cohorts. Each recommendation traces back to policy, actuarial, investment, finance, and reinsurance systems. Missing evidence is flagged for human review.

    Research prototype · controlled access

    Schedule a walkthrough
  • Frontier Audio Lab

    Problem

    A voice agent can sound natural and still fail on latency, tool completion, cost, or handoff.

    What it demonstrates

    Ten controlled route-cases compare OpenAI Realtime and Gemini Live with the same audio and rules. Every run records latency, cost, blind-judge scores, failures, and budget enforcement.

    Research prototype · controlled access

    Schedule a walkthrough
  • EVM program control playbook

    Problem

    Cost and schedule reports show variance but often fail to connect it to the forecast and corrective action.

    What it demonstrates

    The practitioner playbook ties scope, schedule, and cost to one baseline. It then shows where AI can draft variance analysis and forecasts for human review.

    Published playbook · controlled walkthrough

    Schedule a walkthrough

Architecture

The agent prepares. Rules constrain. A person decides.

Across field operations, capital diligence, program control, and voice, the workflow follows the same sequence. Gather context, apply rules, prepare a recommendation, request approval, act, and record.

  1. 01Signal
  2. 02Context
  3. 03Agent
  4. 04Rule
  5. 05Recommendation
  6. 06Approval
  7. 07Action
  8. 08Record

Begin with reversible work. Keep high-impact actions with a named approver until the test evidence supports a wider boundary.

How we engage

Four steps from workflow to evidence.

The first test should be small, reversible, and measurable. High-impact actions stay with a named approver.

  1. 01 · Define the workflowChoose one repeated decision or task. Name its owner, current baseline, and target result.
  2. 02 · Set the agent boundaryList the tools the agent may use, the actions it cannot take, the review points, and the required record.
  3. 03 · Build the working pathUse representative data and only the systems needed to answer the business question.
  4. 04 · Test and hand offRun ordinary cases, edge cases, refusals, escalations, cost, latency, and evidence capture. Record the open risks and next operating steps.

SI and platform delivery

Work inside the customer relationship

Roverax can build the prototype, controls, test plan, and adoption handoff inside an SI or platform team's customer engagement. The account owner keeps the commercial relationship.

  • Account owner remains primeThe SI or platform team leads the customer relationship.
  • Roverax runs the prototypeScope, sandbox, controls, measurements, and decision records.
  • Stack fits the customer environmentUse the customer's tools where they fit. Add only what the test requires.
  • Handoff names who owns whatOwners, training, operating reviews, and open risks stay with the build.

Technology stack

Tools selected for the workflow.

These tools appear in the research prototypes or have been evaluated for client delivery. The list is not a claim of endorsement or partnership.

Roverax technology stack by category, role, and vendors
CategoryRole in deliveryVendors
Agent delivery · voice · customer operationsAgent platforms, real-time voice, warm transfer, messaging, and helpdesk work
Speech · media · runtimeSTT, TTS, WebRTC, voice pipelines, and serverless compute
Models · evaluationModel routing, controlled comparisons, and independent judging
Workflow · memory · observabilityAgent workflows, context over time, traces, and evidence capture
Operations · reportingDecision surfaces, workflow reporting, and relationship records

Next

Bring the workflow you want to improve. We will map the owner, boundary, and test.

Nash Vedula · Founder, Roverax AI Services

Map the first workflow