Enterprise operations · transformation
Turn one operating problem into a controlled test
We map the work across teams, systems, and approval points, then define the owner, baseline, prototype, and operating handoff.
Map the first workflowEnterprise AI delivery · governance · adoption
In 30 days, Roverax scopes one workflow, sets the agent's boundaries, builds a working prototype, and measures the result. Your team then has evidence to decide whether a production pilot is worth funding.
The business problem
Operational AI must work a queue, call approved tools, stop at a decision boundary, request review, and leave a usable record. Roverax builds and tests that path against the customer's process.
What we build
Choose the use case, map the process, set the baseline, and prepare the team that will own it.
Build agents that gather evidence, use approved tools, and stop for review before high-impact actions. Every run leaves a decision record.
Connect cost, schedule, risk, and supplier signals to a baseline, forecast, owner, and corrective action.
Let the agent complete work inside its boundary. When a person needs to take over, pass the context, intent, and next action with the call.
Who this is for
Enterprise operations · transformation
We map the work across teams, systems, and approval points, then define the owner, baseline, prototype, and operating handoff.
Map the first workflowRisk · compliance · AI governance
Put NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 concepts into the workflow as permissions, review points, evidence requirements, and incident handling.
See the control patternSystems integrator · platform partner
Roverax runs the sandbox build, control design, test plan, and adoption handoff within your customer engagement.
See the partner modelSelected work
Each prototype uses synthetic or public data. The cards state what is running, what is measured, and where a person remains responsible. Metered demos stay behind controlled access.
Field Command Center
ProblemA carrier sees churn, fraud, and service signals in separate systems, while customer actions still require eligibility checks and human approval.
What it demonstratesA trained model scores churn. Rules limit the eligible actions, and an LLM ranks and explains them. A person approves the recommendation. The system seals the run in a hash-chained record.
Research prototype · controlled access
Schedule a walkthroughLife and annuity capital raise
ProblemA life and annuity carrier wants to raise capital from an institutional investor. It must choose a suitable policy cohort and assemble the evidence for diligence.
What it demonstratesAgents map the book and rank candidate cohorts. Each recommendation traces back to policy, actuarial, investment, finance, and reinsurance systems. Missing evidence is flagged for human review.
Research prototype · controlled access
Schedule a walkthroughFrontier Audio Lab
ProblemA voice agent can sound natural and still fail on latency, tool completion, cost, or handoff.
What it demonstratesTen controlled route-cases compare OpenAI Realtime and Gemini Live with the same audio and rules. Every run records latency, cost, blind-judge scores, failures, and budget enforcement.
Research prototype · controlled access
Schedule a walkthroughEVM program control playbook
ProblemCost and schedule reports show variance but often fail to connect it to the forecast and corrective action.
What it demonstratesThe practitioner playbook ties scope, schedule, and cost to one baseline. It then shows where AI can draft variance analysis and forecasts for human review.
Published playbook · controlled walkthrough
Schedule a walkthroughArchitecture
Across field operations, capital diligence, program control, and voice, the workflow follows the same sequence. Gather context, apply rules, prepare a recommendation, request approval, act, and record.
Begin with reversible work. Keep high-impact actions with a named approver until the test evidence supports a wider boundary.
How we engage
The first test should be small, reversible, and measurable. High-impact actions stay with a named approver.
SI and platform delivery
Roverax can build the prototype, controls, test plan, and adoption handoff inside an SI or platform team's customer engagement. The account owner keeps the commercial relationship.
Technology stack
These tools appear in the research prototypes or have been evaluated for client delivery. The list is not a claim of endorsement or partnership.
| Category | Role in delivery | Vendors |
|---|---|---|
| Agent delivery · voice · customer operations | Agent platforms, real-time voice, warm transfer, messaging, and helpdesk work | |
| Speech · media · runtime | STT, TTS, WebRTC, voice pipelines, and serverless compute | |
| Models · evaluation | Model routing, controlled comparisons, and independent judging | |
| Workflow · memory · observability | Agent workflows, context over time, traces, and evidence capture | |
| Operations · reporting | Decision surfaces, workflow reporting, and relationship records |
Vendor notice. Names identify tools used in research or proposed integrations. They do not imply endorsement or a commercial relationship. All marks belong to their owners.
Next
Nash Vedula · Founder, Roverax AI Services